i know that Jason menz (jmenz) has had his 397cc LIMITED cub run a 3.63 and a pile of 3.70 passes at LEERJAK. the same bike that won the east coas PS drags classes 0-400,0-475,0-550
I can appreciate what you are trying to do Rob ... I really do --- but, I have to agree - Nitro in a limited class, even if it is 2-stroke ... imo - No way .... I personally, have seen gains.
Backed up within 4 days ? Why 4 ?
IMO - records should only count in qualifying & eliminations ... not test - n- tune.
If you truely want to take the atv drag racing records to the next step - you might reconsider weight limits & density altitude corrections.
So is video a mandatory "rule" or just a good idea ?
You asked for input & that is just mine.
I agree whole heartedly...is that a word LOL?? Dont get me wrong, Im not complaining or crying. I appreciate your efforts to take the initiative to want to recognize peoples hard work, Rob. Unlike others, and we all know who that is LOL. But no other sport recognizes stats or records during practice. If records are recognized during practice or tnt, then whats the point of racing and competing? I mean, this is still drag racing, isnt it???
But like Chris said, that is just my perspective and input. What ever you decide to do, I applaud and respect your decision.
i know that Jason menz (jmenz) has had his 397cc LIMITED cub run a 3.63 and a pile of 3.70 passes at LEERJAK. the same bike that won the east coas PS drags classes 0-400,0-475,0-550
doesnt make sense why there are 4 stroke stock frame classes and not 2 stroke. yes you can get a stock frame light, but its still not a rigid drag chassis, extended 12 inches out the front, etc. jus my opinion,
Just may very well do thatBecause 4 strokes have a set of rules & classes and their own race is put on twice a year @ Outlaw, and now there's a couple other tracks that are following the same format. That's what the racers wanted so Eric stepped up and made it happen. Not everyone has to follow the planetsand format. If you want 2 stroke oem frame classes, you'll have to put on your own show. JMO of course.
You are way right in the fuzzyness of implied intent through text ... can be impossible at times.
My [censored] hat is off to you Rob for your efforts in this matter - lord knows you have been through alot of trials & tribs concerning record setting.
Way to recognize Menz's efforts & achievements ... dude is way fast, way legit & currently the guy to beat in that particular class.
I'll roll with whatever ... but agree to disagree with a few things concerning record setting.
i agree 100% with the fact that there needs to be a set of "universal" rules set. although there will need to be differences between different forms of the racing. example, heads up, and tracks that use a dial in time. I am all for everything good that will come of the "records list" as it would seem to get the large companies to have something to push or strive for and get them back to building record bikes for their own advertisement. and we would really get a chance to see how competitive our sport truly is.If Jason's bike ran record numbers when he was actually racing in those classes, then absolutely hell yes IMO.
That's the ultimate pat on the back for a job well done...taking down bigger motors with a smaller one.
I don't think a single person would say boo...and it'll make them shoot harder.
However...I think we may be missing the boat.
Without a universal sanctioning structure and class rules, this sport will never advance.
Which...means real tech inspections and weight rules....
Any other motor sport has 'em. If we want to grow, we'll have to have 'em too.
Ok here's the way i look at it. You have a big event bracket racing etc. After its all done what does everybody want to know? Who ran how fast w/ what bike... if your a bracket racer guy great bracket race then. I'm into setting records thats what drives me... I'm not trying to sound like an ahole and please dont take it that way. If someone is faster an me thats awsome i get excited because i know i have more work to do. There is a big differance in typing and talking to someone. My wife was texting someone the other day and the guy took it the wrong way and told her off. She cryed for an hour. he was a friend. if you want to call me that would be great.
If Jason's bike ran record numbers when he was actually racing in those classes, then absolutely hell yes IMO.
That's the ultimate pat on the back for a job well done...taking down bigger motors with a smaller one.
I don't think a single person would say boo...and it'll make them shoot harder.
However...I think we may be missing the boat.
Without a universal sanctioning structure and class rules, this sport will never advance.
Which...means real tech inspections and weight rules....
Any other motor sport has 'em. If we want to grow, we'll have to have 'em too.
..but im all for the weight limit if the frames keep getting stupid dangerous but if u are competitive and most are,you either gotta lighten your frame beyond safty or get beat and who likes to get beat!..I DONT!..
Is there a safety aspect ... yes but, I wasn't refering to that when mentioning weight. You don't have to get beat if your heavier than the competition ...![]()
The weight thing Dave isn't about getting beat necc. - but rather being able to make an accurate comparison between potential record holders ... 2nd case in point being Density Altitude.
Of course those are under ideal conditions ... we are only working with 1 of the 3 main factors of drag racing in regards to record holding. Engine size. Weight & Air quality being the other 2 .. feel me ?