QUOTE (FireHead @ Jul 30 2009, 08:47 AM)
index.php?act=findpost&pid=51672I would go along with that.
Tensile strength is the term you were looking for, not shear strength.
Ah yes......thanks firehead. That was what I meant
QUOTE (Koolguyson @ Jul 30 2009, 04:03 PM)
index.php?act=findpost&pid=51753Bunch of pansies. I have a .035/.049 Lonestar DUNE chassis. I even had a head on collision at the top of the Pismo flats about 5 years ago (68-69mph) and the chassis was STRAIGHT. Bent steering stem/a-amrs, but the chassis was straight. The 400ex that pulled in front of me ended up a lot worse.
I don't recommend these chassis, and I don't think Lonestar even sells them any more, but its pretty bad a$$.
WOW. Are you sure it was a lonestar. I know Jeff at metaltech told me he had made a few .049 chassis's but that he would never do it again. .035 has no place on any dune or hillshooter chassis. I have some .049 that just sits on the rack because I just wont use except for some simple cross bars. Its just not worth the liability. Its bad enough that if someone crashes, the first thing everyone does is try to blame the builder. Even if the product was being misused, they still turn to the fabricator and point the finger.
I remember seeing the post on PS about the aluminum drag chassis with a turbo huyabusa motor in it. A heim joints busted and the bike crashed bad. Well the entire frame got mangled in the crash. Next thing you know, everyone started bagging on the chassis design, quality of build, etc. But in the end, It wouldnt have mattered if it was chromoly, titanium, etc. With how fast the bike was going when it crashed, any chassis would have gotten twisted up like this one did.